Anonymous has this to say:
"Deborah gave a different story to the Family. Saying she was at the house finishing a chemical peel when realized Mitch wasn't back from his morning exercise. Also realizing his laptop, keys,(No car) including cell phone were still in the house. She freaks out calls the police? Said she looked for Mitch everywhere in the house.
Wouldn't you call security first check if he is outside talking to neighbors (Security cameras?) And when police came they of course found him.
Why isn't she a suspect!! Or her son who also lived at the house. Is there a way to get pictures of the scene. The whole story doesn't even make sense.
And Deborah is not even responding to all normal questions that the family has. Stating they were having marital issues and out of nowhere Mitch had bipolar disorders when was he diagnosed?
He had spent a weekend long with his mom after a business trip his Mom saw him Happy as always and ready for all that his upcoming plans with the book and his businesses (Deborah hated that he spend time with his family!! All the attention needs to be with her at all times. (Not to mention other nastiness Deborah says about the husband she said to Loved!!) Really!!now that he is gone. If they were having issues why buy a house in Feb? "
Posted as a Comment, HERE
http://mitchhuhemresearch.blogspot.com/2016/03/deborah-huhem-is-very-greedy-and.html
More on the Deborah Huhem, Ted Bernstein story at
http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/
Tuesday, March 22, 2016
Thursday, October 22, 2015
Thursday, May 28, 2015
Whistle Blower Retaliation is Against the LAW.but Montana Police, Detectives, Judges, County Attorneys and the University of Montana SPECIALIZE in Targeting those who EXPOSE injustice, corruption and judicial overreach.
It is CLEARLY spelled out in Federal Whistleblower Laws and Regulations that Whistleblower Retaliation is ILLEGAL, yet the Missoula Police Department, Missoula County Attorney, the University of Montana, and Missoula and Ravalli County Judges, CLEARLY violate the rights of those blowing the whistle on judicial corruption in Montana, on Rapes, stalkers and the crimes that the police are and have committed against the citizens.
Even if you are found to be a criminal, in any way, for any reason, you can still be a whistle blower, as a matter of Law. Yet Montana Law Enforcement takes a whistle blower, a reporter as they did me, Bill Windsor, and Michael Spreadbury, as well as Mary Deneen, and they place a protective order against them to STOP them from telling about what they know. If they do talk after this, they are threatened with Jail or actually jailed. (False Imprisonment).
If you blog about, or start an independent local newspaper about local corruption in the State of Montana, you are harassed, you are set up, you may even be killed in the back of a cop car and it's officially called a SUICIDE. You will face economic terrorism, lose your job, end up in court for things even as small as sound pollution or any law they can find to shut you up.
The Good Cops in Montana are ran out, as they try and stand up to the rogue cops working outside the law and constitutional rights and they are retaliated against in the EXTREME.
Attorneys are afraid to represent folks like me, Michael Spreadbury, Mary Deneen, Bill Windsor and others telling the TRUTH about Montana Law Enforcement and the University of Montana, as they will lose their license to practice law, or worse, in the face of EXTREME RETALIATION.
We have Civil Rights and a good legal case worth 100's of millions of dollars. We have a RICO case against all these Montana agencies and Federal Agencies as well as the University of Montana. The pattern and history is very clear, they do the same thing over and over. We have rights and yet no one will represent to sue these folks as they are afraid of the same EXTREME RETALIATON by Montana Law Enforcement who are puppets to much higher powers covering up corruption.
When YOUR Tax dollars are used to pay University's, Local Federal and State Law Enforcement, FBI bloggers ,and more to harass those that are actually reporting on matters of public concern then something is very WRONG and seriously corrupt.
We have a VERY Good Whistle Blower Legal actions against all Montana Entities who have used extreme retaliation to suppress our speech, chill speech and to flat out STOP the flow of information via UNCONSTITUTIONAL protective orders and EXTREME harassment, intimidation and bullying. If you are an Attorney that wishes to represent in a Whistleblower lawsuit, eMail me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
The University of Montana, the Missoula Police Department, Missoula County, Ravalli County, Lincoln County and more of those who have used extreme whistle blower retaliation tactics against us, have undoubtedly received federal grants, block grants, incentives, and other monies in which mean that if one TELLS ON THEM, the whistleblower can receive a percentage of the money in which these agencies misused. You can find all the money they get from the public records and file a Qui Tam legal action, as well as other Whistle Blower Retaliation Legal Action.
The University of Montana and the Missoula Police Department have, in my understanding, recieved many Homeland Security and other Federal Grants over the last 8 years in which they have retaliated against those who are exposing corruption in Montana.
It is not speculation, it is NOT conspiracy theory, it is full out 100% provable fact that I told The University of Montana, the Missoula Police Department, and many county, state and federal officials what was happening in Montana. I was retaliated against severely and so was Michael Spreadbury, Mary Deneen and Bill Windsor. This is a fact. And still these same government entities, ON YOUR DIME, do all they can to set up, to maliciously prosecute ,to criminally defame and to flat out discredit those trying to let the public know what is really going on with their tax dollars.
This article below is interesting, wonder how many of us reporting on corruption have been on their GET A GRANT because there is an ALLEGED Hazard. I know I was on a watch list at one time and WHY? Well I reported on cops having sex with underage women to get out of a ticket, cops running drugs and protecting rapist and the SOLUTION was to get a grant and go after ME, the one blowing the whistle and trying to give victims a voice.
http://missoulian.com/news/local/police-to-withdraw-grant-application-citing-rainbows-as-hazard/article_bd9f86fd-2e41-5eb9-9e66-d0ae1b917774.html
Group Promoting Peace and Love LABELED as Terrorists in Montana
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/hippy-rainbow-gathering-labeled-terrorists-watched-department-homeland-security/
The Missoula Police Department will withdraw a Homeland Security grant application that names the Rainbow Family as an extremist "hazard,"
http://www.discussionist.com/1015349886
File a Freedom of Information Request to see how much FEDERAL Money they get to call us anti-corruption bloggers terrorists.
I would say One should get FOI requests to the Missoula Police Department to see how many homeland security GRANTS, Federal Money, DOJ Grants, they got to harass anti-corruption bloggers and whistleblowers? Then we can SUE them in a Qui Tam legal action.
Me reporting the TRUTH on massively corrupt, sexual deviant cops in Lincoln County Montana must have got local law enforcement all kinds of money. I know in the summer of 2009 there was a grant of around $400,000 to the Libby Law Enforcement from Homeland Security. They used it to bulk up hours and overtime, and harass those of us TELLING ON THEM.
Cops were seen running drugs, rapists were protected as they were said to be running drugs for the cops. We reached out to the highest agencies in the State of Montana we could and NO HELP was ever given to us. The Law Enforcement was and is a super power that is Above the Law in MT.
Sometimes I would call my home and get homeland security, the thing is all I was doing was trying to do is to get police to prosecute rapists. Now the DOJ investigated the University of Montana and the Missoula Police in regard to massive investigated or prosecuted rapes. The thing is they don't care about RAPE. Its all about protecting law enforcement and shutting up whistle blowers, who are often times the GOOD COPS trying to do what is right.
ALL I was doing was trying to REPORT RAPES that were not investigated in Montana and I suffered EXTREME Retaliation from Cops, Judges, County Attorneys and more in the State of Montana, as did Michael Spreadbury. Film Producer and Anti-Corruption blogger, whistle blower Bill Windsor reported our story and then he himself faced this same EXTREME Retaliation and even worse civil rights violations. All because he obeyed the LAW and told the TRUTH about what is REALLY, Truly going on in the beautiful State of Montana.
Expose Government WASTE. Get a List of Federal Grants these folks get and EXPOSE that they used the money to SILENCE anti-corruption bloggers and to RETALIATE against Whistleblowers.
Check this information out folks, Missoula Montana takes too much FEDERAL money and what do they do, they violate the rights of Montana Citizens, of rape victims and of those doing the right thing and actually reporting the TRUTH.
Below are some articles on local concern and issues with Homeland Security Grants that enable Missoula County, Missoula Police and the University of Montana to TARGET anti-corruption bloggers, to retaliate against us and to IGNORE the rights of rape and stalking victims and other major crimes in effort to cover up for ocal law enforcement and mysterious political agendas.
Public urges Missoula council to be cautious with Homeland Security grants
http://missoulian.com/news/local/public-urges-missoula-council-to-be-cautious-with-homeland-security/article_7e9916ef-1551-5d39-86e8-0b756ba15846.html
The Missoula Police Department and the University of Montana use FEDERAL MONEY to harass anti-corruption bloggers and to RETALIATE against Whistle Blowers.
Police Seek DHS Grant to Deal With "Extremist" Hippy..
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/01/30/police-seek-dhs-grant-deal-extremist-hippy-group-stresses-non-violence-peace-love/
I am the GOOD GUY. Bill Windsor is the Good Guy. Michael Spreadbury is the GOOD GUY. Yet they target us, make us look the criminal in court, jail us, target us, retaliate against us, ruin our life, business, health and family and violate our human and constitutional rights, and all to protect rapists, corrupt cops, and to keep the grant money pouring on. We are the Collateral Damage, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. Tell the TRUTH. Obey the LAW.
COPS Technology and COPS Technology X2, nearly a million dollars and the Missoula Police REFUSE to actually track IP's and do anything really technical?? WOW !!
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D13G5AIz7BeHTHVebfwq4YyqRXF1tgFpgvYmjCFJU1g/edit
"Fund provided by the Department of Justice, COPS Office enable the Missoula Police Department to increase its effectiveness and efficient. It also enhances the technological capacity of our department to assist in problem solving and other community policing activities."
Time to EXPOSE Every CENT that the Missoula Police use to SHAKE DOWN, Criminally Defame and Maliciously Prosecute whistle blowers, reporters, film producers and ant-corruption bloggers.
FOI Request on EVERY Single Grant that the Missoula Police Department Got and what they REALLY Did with it.
Get a List of All Federal Block Grants used to FUND the Missoula Police and the University of Montana as the RETALIATE against whistle blowers.
ftp://ftp.ci.missoula.mt.us/Documents/Resolutions/6558.pdf
The Missoula Police Department gets Department of Justice Grants to VIOLATE the rights of victims of real crimes
Whistle Blower Information
http://www.whistleblowers.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=34&Itemid=63
http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/settlements/whistleblower-settlements/
http://www.michaelbest.com/files/Uploads/Documents/Publications/24th%20Annual%20Labor%20Seminar/Workshop_K.pdf
THE MISSSOULA COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE AND THE MISSOULA POLICE DEPARTMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH LOCAL JUDGES HAVE RETALIATED AGAINST WHISTLE BLOWER BILL WINDSOR AND THAT IS A FACT.
"Protected whistleblowing is defined as disclosing information
that the discloser reasonably believes evidences:
1. a violation of law, rule, or regulation;
2. gross mismanagement;
3. gross waste of funds;
4. an abuse of authority; or
5. a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.
"If you believe that you have been subject to retaliation for protected
whistleblowing you can file a complaint with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel
(OSC). OSC is an independent agency that investigates and prosecutes allegations
of prohibited personnel practices (PPP) by federal employees."
More at Link Below
https://osc.gov/Resources/post_wbr.pdf
http://www.workplacefairness.org/general-whistleblowing
http://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2015-75.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblower_Protection_Act
http://www.whistleblowers.gov/
Even if you are found to be a criminal, in any way, for any reason, you can still be a whistle blower, as a matter of Law. Yet Montana Law Enforcement takes a whistle blower, a reporter as they did me, Bill Windsor, and Michael Spreadbury, as well as Mary Deneen, and they place a protective order against them to STOP them from telling about what they know. If they do talk after this, they are threatened with Jail or actually jailed. (False Imprisonment).If you blog about, or start an independent local newspaper about local corruption in the State of Montana, you are harassed, you are set up, you may even be killed in the back of a cop car and it's officially called a SUICIDE. You will face economic terrorism, lose your job, end up in court for things even as small as sound pollution or any law they can find to shut you up.
The Good Cops in Montana are ran out, as they try and stand up to the rogue cops working outside the law and constitutional rights and they are retaliated against in the EXTREME.
Attorneys are afraid to represent folks like me, Michael Spreadbury, Mary Deneen, Bill Windsor and others telling the TRUTH about Montana Law Enforcement and the University of Montana, as they will lose their license to practice law, or worse, in the face of EXTREME RETALIATION. We have Civil Rights and a good legal case worth 100's of millions of dollars. We have a RICO case against all these Montana agencies and Federal Agencies as well as the University of Montana. The pattern and history is very clear, they do the same thing over and over. We have rights and yet no one will represent to sue these folks as they are afraid of the same EXTREME RETALIATON by Montana Law Enforcement who are puppets to much higher powers covering up corruption.
When YOUR Tax dollars are used to pay University's, Local Federal and State Law Enforcement, FBI bloggers ,and more to harass those that are actually reporting on matters of public concern then something is very WRONG and seriously corrupt.
We have a VERY Good Whistle Blower Legal actions against all Montana Entities who have used extreme retaliation to suppress our speech, chill speech and to flat out STOP the flow of information via UNCONSTITUTIONAL protective orders and EXTREME harassment, intimidation and bullying. If you are an Attorney that wishes to represent in a Whistleblower lawsuit, eMail me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
The University of Montana, the Missoula Police Department, Missoula County, Ravalli County, Lincoln County and more of those who have used extreme whistle blower retaliation tactics against us, have undoubtedly received federal grants, block grants, incentives, and other monies in which mean that if one TELLS ON THEM, the whistleblower can receive a percentage of the money in which these agencies misused. You can find all the money they get from the public records and file a Qui Tam legal action, as well as other Whistle Blower Retaliation Legal Action.
The University of Montana and the Missoula Police Department have, in my understanding, recieved many Homeland Security and other Federal Grants over the last 8 years in which they have retaliated against those who are exposing corruption in Montana.
It is not speculation, it is NOT conspiracy theory, it is full out 100% provable fact that I told The University of Montana, the Missoula Police Department, and many county, state and federal officials what was happening in Montana. I was retaliated against severely and so was Michael Spreadbury, Mary Deneen and Bill Windsor. This is a fact. And still these same government entities, ON YOUR DIME, do all they can to set up, to maliciously prosecute ,to criminally defame and to flat out discredit those trying to let the public know what is really going on with their tax dollars.
This article below is interesting, wonder how many of us reporting on corruption have been on their GET A GRANT because there is an ALLEGED Hazard. I know I was on a watch list at one time and WHY? Well I reported on cops having sex with underage women to get out of a ticket, cops running drugs and protecting rapist and the SOLUTION was to get a grant and go after ME, the one blowing the whistle and trying to give victims a voice.
http://missoulian.com/news/local/police-to-withdraw-grant-application-citing-rainbows-as-hazard/article_bd9f86fd-2e41-5eb9-9e66-d0ae1b917774.html
Group Promoting Peace and Love LABELED as Terrorists in Montana
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/hippy-rainbow-gathering-labeled-terrorists-watched-department-homeland-security/
The Missoula Police Department will withdraw a Homeland Security grant application that names the Rainbow Family as an extremist "hazard,"
http://www.discussionist.com/1015349886
File a Freedom of Information Request to the University of Montana, Homeland Security, Missoula County, the Missoula Police Department, and the Missoula County Attorney office.
File a Freedom of Information Request to see how much FEDERAL Money they get to call us anti-corruption bloggers terrorists.
I would say One should get FOI requests to the Missoula Police Department to see how many homeland security GRANTS, Federal Money, DOJ Grants, they got to harass anti-corruption bloggers and whistleblowers? Then we can SUE them in a Qui Tam legal action.
Me reporting the TRUTH on massively corrupt, sexual deviant cops in Lincoln County Montana must have got local law enforcement all kinds of money. I know in the summer of 2009 there was a grant of around $400,000 to the Libby Law Enforcement from Homeland Security. They used it to bulk up hours and overtime, and harass those of us TELLING ON THEM.
Cops were seen running drugs, rapists were protected as they were said to be running drugs for the cops. We reached out to the highest agencies in the State of Montana we could and NO HELP was ever given to us. The Law Enforcement was and is a super power that is Above the Law in MT.
Sometimes I would call my home and get homeland security, the thing is all I was doing was trying to do is to get police to prosecute rapists. Now the DOJ investigated the University of Montana and the Missoula Police in regard to massive investigated or prosecuted rapes. The thing is they don't care about RAPE. Its all about protecting law enforcement and shutting up whistle blowers, who are often times the GOOD COPS trying to do what is right.
ALL I was doing was trying to REPORT RAPES that were not investigated in Montana and I suffered EXTREME Retaliation from Cops, Judges, County Attorneys and more in the State of Montana, as did Michael Spreadbury. Film Producer and Anti-Corruption blogger, whistle blower Bill Windsor reported our story and then he himself faced this same EXTREME Retaliation and even worse civil rights violations. All because he obeyed the LAW and told the TRUTH about what is REALLY, Truly going on in the beautiful State of Montana.
Expose Government WASTE. Get a List of Federal Grants these folks get and EXPOSE that they used the money to SILENCE anti-corruption bloggers and to RETALIATE against Whistleblowers.
Check this information out folks, Missoula Montana takes too much FEDERAL money and what do they do, they violate the rights of Montana Citizens, of rape victims and of those doing the right thing and actually reporting the TRUTH.
Below are some articles on local concern and issues with Homeland Security Grants that enable Missoula County, Missoula Police and the University of Montana to TARGET anti-corruption bloggers, to retaliate against us and to IGNORE the rights of rape and stalking victims and other major crimes in effort to cover up for ocal law enforcement and mysterious political agendas.
Public urges Missoula council to be cautious with Homeland Security grants
http://missoulian.com/news/local/public-urges-missoula-council-to-be-cautious-with-homeland-security/article_7e9916ef-1551-5d39-86e8-0b756ba15846.html
The Missoula Police Department and the University of Montana use FEDERAL MONEY to harass anti-corruption bloggers and to RETALIATE against Whistle Blowers.
Who will represent us in a Qui Tam legal action
to prove that they have misused these grants?
Police Seek DHS Grant to Deal With "Extremist" Hippy..
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/01/30/police-seek-dhs-grant-deal-extremist-hippy-group-stresses-non-violence-peace-love/
IT is TIME for a FREEDOM OF INFORMATION Request
to find out how many times the Missoula Police have
sought these grants to come after those of us
who are trying to make the world a better place.
I am the GOOD GUY. Bill Windsor is the Good Guy. Michael Spreadbury is the GOOD GUY. Yet they target us, make us look the criminal in court, jail us, target us, retaliate against us, ruin our life, business, health and family and violate our human and constitutional rights, and all to protect rapists, corrupt cops, and to keep the grant money pouring on. We are the Collateral Damage, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. Tell the TRUTH. Obey the LAW.
COPS Technology and COPS Technology X2, nearly a million dollars and the Missoula Police REFUSE to actually track IP's and do anything really technical?? WOW !!
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D13G5AIz7BeHTHVebfwq4YyqRXF1tgFpgvYmjCFJU1g/edit
"Fund provided by the Department of Justice, COPS Office enable the Missoula Police Department to increase its effectiveness and efficient. It also enhances the technological capacity of our department to assist in problem solving and other community policing activities."
TELL the DOJ what the Missoula Police Really did with that MONEY.
Time to EXPOSE Every CENT that the Missoula Police use to SHAKE DOWN, Criminally Defame and Maliciously Prosecute whistle blowers, reporters, film producers and ant-corruption bloggers.
FOI Request on EVERY Single Grant that the Missoula Police Department Got and what they REALLY Did with it.
Get a List of All Federal Block Grants used to FUND the Missoula Police and the University of Montana as the RETALIATE against whistle blowers.
ftp://ftp.ci.missoula.mt.us/Documents/Resolutions/6558.pdf
"A RESOLUTION Of THE MISSOULA CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL BLOCK GRANT MONIES
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES AND DIRECTING AND
AUTHORIZING THE POLICE CHIEF TO BE THE OFFICIAL CITY
REPRESENTATIVE WHO SHALL PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION NECESSARY FOR THE GRANT APPLICATION PURPOSES."
The Missoula Police Department gets Department of Justice Grants to VIOLATE the rights of victims of real crimes
in Missoula Montana.
The Rainbow Gather was a HUGE Media Storm for the Missoula Police Department as was the maswsive uninvestigated RAPES on the University of Montana Campus. However it is time to research all DOJ funding to the Missoula police and ALL Missoula Police Department Homeland Security Grants and what they were actually used for.
MisUSE of Department of Justice GRANTS is a Public Issue
Whistle Blower Information
http://www.whistleblowers.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=34&Itemid=63
A Bit on Whistle Blower Settlement
http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/settlements/whistleblower-settlements/
http://www.michaelbest.com/files/Uploads/Documents/Publications/24th%20Annual%20Labor%20Seminar/Workshop_K.pdf
THE MISSSOULA COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE AND THE MISSOULA POLICE DEPARTMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH LOCAL JUDGES HAVE RETALIATED AGAINST WHISTLE BLOWER BILL WINDSOR AND THAT IS A FACT.
A Bit about Whistle Blower Retaliation
"Protected whistleblowing is defined as disclosing information
that the discloser reasonably believes evidences:
1. a violation of law, rule, or regulation;
2. gross mismanagement;
3. gross waste of funds;
4. an abuse of authority; or
5. a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.
"If you believe that you have been subject to retaliation for protected
whistleblowing you can file a complaint with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel
(OSC). OSC is an independent agency that investigates and prosecutes allegations
of prohibited personnel practices (PPP) by federal employees."
More at Link Below
https://osc.gov/Resources/post_wbr.pdf
http://www.workplacefairness.org/general-whistleblowing
http://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2015-75.html
Whistle Blower Protection Act
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblower_Protection_Act
http://www.whistleblowers.gov/
The Missoula Police Department and the University of Montana have consistently IGNORED the rights of victims who reach out to them for help. Yet they try and convince the PUBLIC that they take Rapes, Crime Serious. WHEN CLEARLY THEY DO NOT.
The Bill Windsor, Lawless America Film Producer case is ONE example of how those who try and report crimes committed against them in the State of Montana, are not only NOT HEARD, their allegations NOT Investigated but they also face extreme retaliation by Montana Law Enforcement, Montana Judges and Montana Prosecutors for speaking out about BLATANT injustice, human and civil rights violations, First Amendment Violations
The Missoula Police and the University of Montana as well as Judge Haynes and Judge Townsend and many others IGNORED Bill Windsor asking for help, though I, Crystal Cox had done the same thing years prior. They simply go on the stated word of the WRONG PERSON with no investigation what so ever. They do this to SUPPRESS the TRUTH about Montana Homeland Security Programs, and to not EXPOSE the federal grants they get to investigate us, when really we are the ones blowing the whistle on the local cops, judges, prosecutor and judges who IGNORE RAPE in Montana.
The Missoula Police and the University of Montana do this to protect corruption in Montana, to cover up for University of Montana programs under Homeland Security Grants most likely in which pay stalker to harass anti-corruption bloggers and SUPPRESS what Montana Law Enforcement actually, really, truly does to Montana Citizens.
Below is Many of Bill Windsors Complaints against Sean Boushie, ALL IGNORED by Montana Law Enforcement, the same Montana Law Enforcement, Counties, Judges and University of Montana in which ignored my rights and ruined my life and business and put me under years of duress, and the also did this to Michael Spreadbury who was also reporting on the WHOLE TRUTH about Montana Law Enforcement, Politicians and the University of Montana.
Click Below for Many Complaints IGNORED in this Matter
as Seen On Lawless America Blog
Bill Windsor made one police complaint after another, and no one even bothered to contact him. At least 37 complaints — all ignored.
The Missoula Police and the University of Montana as well as Judge Haynes and Judge Townsend and many others IGNORED Bill Windsor asking for help, though I, Crystal Cox had done the same thing years prior. They simply go on the stated word of the WRONG PERSON with no investigation what so ever. They do this to SUPPRESS the TRUTH about Montana Homeland Security Programs, and to not EXPOSE the federal grants they get to investigate us, when really we are the ones blowing the whistle on the local cops, judges, prosecutor and judges who IGNORE RAPE in Montana.
The Missoula Police and the University of Montana do this to protect corruption in Montana, to cover up for University of Montana programs under Homeland Security Grants most likely in which pay stalker to harass anti-corruption bloggers and SUPPRESS what Montana Law Enforcement actually, really, truly does to Montana Citizens.
Below is Many of Bill Windsors Complaints against Sean Boushie, ALL IGNORED by Montana Law Enforcement, the same Montana Law Enforcement, Counties, Judges and University of Montana in which ignored my rights and ruined my life and business and put me under years of duress, and the also did this to Michael Spreadbury who was also reporting on the WHOLE TRUTH about Montana Law Enforcement, Politicians and the University of Montana.Click Below for Many Complaints IGNORED in this Matter
as Seen On Lawless America Blog
"Sean Boushie has been protected by law enforcement
again and again and again.
Bill Windsor made one police complaint after another, and no one even bothered to contact him. At least 37 complaints — all ignored.
Monday, May 4, 2015
Judge Martin Colin and the case of the Simon Bernstein Estate where a deceased man signed probate documents. A case of alleged murder, a heavy metal toxin coroner''s report and millions paid in insurance by Heritage Life (Jackson National) and with NO POLICY.
''41. That Eliot has alleged that further retaliation comes from the recent Estate and Probate
crimes being committed against his family, which once again are crimes again done primarily
by attorneys at law and judges acting in conspiracy against Eliot’s rights and designed to deny him
his inheritances and where the crimes now include the alleged murder of Simon
(alleged by Ted the day his father died.)
42. That Eliot alleges that the theft of the insurance policy that is the subject of the lawsuit before
this Court is yet further retaliation to deny him expectancies, where Eliot was initially NOT
told of this lawsuit and was not made party to the original complaint and is yet another effort
to steal the estate property and deny him inheritances through fraud committed again by
attorneys at law, Donald R. Tescher, Esq. and his junior partner Robert L. Spallina, Esq., in
concert with Ted, designed to steal millions of dollars of monies for Eliot’s family.
43. This insurance policy theft scheme is to further disable any chance of Eliot getting monies,
which could be used to get counsel to defend his family’s inheritance (he has not received a
dollar from the Estates and Trusts in over two years due to frauds committed that have
delayed their expectancies) and where the inheritance could also be used to pursue his and
others Intellectual Property rights and his RICO, feed his children and more.
44. Eliot and his family were wholly dependent on their inheritances for income as Simon had
set up elaborate estate plans for Eliot’s family to continue to receive monthly income that
Simon and Shirley Bernstein had set up and begun many years before their deaths to protect
Eliot and his family due to the dangerous situation their lives became entangled in and their
inability to seek employment with the onslaught against them.
45. The danger prevented Eliot from gaining employment, as not many employers want to hire
people who have bombs put in their cars and are in the middle of complex RICO litigation
and these funds Simon and Shirley set up paid for all basic living and household expenses for
the home that Eliot’s children own, private school tuitions for the children and all of their other expenses and needs, including but not limited to Health Insurance, Food, Clothing,
Entertainment, etc.
46. That Simon had set up continuation of these payments to occur long into the future upon his
death through his Estate plans and took many precautions to make sure Eliot and his family
would have no problems once he died with income to survive many years and through all the
children’s college educations. That the hijacking and theft of these funds via the crimes in
the probate court are fully intended to cause grave harm and damage to Eliot to keep him
from pursuing his whistleblowing efforts.
47. That Eliot must now protect his family without help from authorities who have been virtually
silent for years on ongoing investigations and silent since being noticed regarding the recent
threat of imminent danger to his family made by a licensed attorney at law, Schwager, and
where Eliot alleges this delay may also be intentional and created by lawyers who are in
prosecutorial roles and controlled by the law firms that are against Eliot, in direct efforts to
deny Eliot and his family state and federal protections.
48. However, it appears that wherever attorneys at law in whatever role they play (private
attorneys, prosecutors, judges, etc.) become involved in Eliot’s life there is no relief and in
fact further retaliations and denials of due process and procedure to Obstruct any chance at
Justice. Hence, there should be an Injunctive Relief that: 1) the Bar Associations or any of
the judges against whom the whistle is being blown on cannot take any action against Eliot or
his family for publishing the truth and 2) the courts must refrain from restricting our
pleadings and motions to protect the innocent.
Wherefore, Eliot request that Eliot be designated with the status of a Whistleblower
and afford all the state and federal Whistleblower protections and provide federal witness
protection.
STAY OF ALL PROCEEDINGS IN THE FLORIDA PROBATE COURT AND
TRANSFER OF ALL FLORIDA PROBATE MATTERS TO THIS COURT
49. The denial of due process, equal protection and obstruction of justice and retaliatory acts
proliferate because the Florida Bar protects the corruption and criminal actions of its
members instead of holding them accountable and issuing strong sanctions as it appears the
enterprise has infiltrated any agency that can investigate them and their self-policing Bar
Association.
50. The Bar Association’s reprobate attorneys at law in charge of disciplinary sanctions against
members appears steeped in corruption and is used to retaliate against honest members doing
the right thing by reporting the corruption they witness that they are duty bound under Oath
of G-d to report and instead promote the bad actor members reported who are acting outside
the color of law for personal gain and who aid and abet the racketeering enterprise.
51. Victims who are turned to the Florida Bar for relief when they report civil, ethical and
criminal misconduct of attorneys at law and judges are subjected to the same retaliatory acts
by the Florida Bar as their member whistleblowers and in giving their complaint information
to the Florida Bar they have basically turned their evidence over to those they are
complaining against as the Florida Bar then gives that information to the accused parties and
again this deprives rights to victims ingrained in traditional investigations.
52. The Florida Bar then typically issues letters to victims of how they reviewed the matters and
found no cause to investigate further and that you owe your attorney fees or words to that
effect. In Eliot’s case, the goodbye good luck letters were found to be written by or aided by
Proskauer Rose attorneys who were violating Florida Bar rules by interfering in the
complaints filed against their firm, which is what led to the investigations in New York and
that led Eliot to the Florida Supreme Court and then the US Supreme Court, where it appears
the attorney protections go all the way up the chain, as neither would review the bar
associations misconduct and thus no remedy avails victims.
53. There is a conflict of interest inherent in the Florida Bar’s self-disciplinary regulatory body
policy for how can a state organization regulate itself and its members and skirt traditional
discipline from criminal investigation, as the bar association disciplinary agencies cannot
investigate or regulate the criminal misconduct of its members and only investigate their
ethical misconduct and sanction or disbar them.
54. The self-policing policy of the Florida Bar does not work – Florida Bar members cannot
unbiasedly investigate the actions of other Florida Bar members and victims complaining
about their members or be counted on to report them to criminal authorities when necessary,
as a protection of brethren members is inherent.
55. Therefore, a loophole in justice is created whereby lawyers committing crimes may evade
criminal prosecution if the state bar fails to contact criminal authorities to investigate claims
made by victims that involve criminal elements and this covers up the felony misconduct
instead. When citizens have complaints, criminal or civil, against judges, prosecutors and private
attorneys at law they are directed by law enforcement to contact the Florida Bar or the
Judicial Qualification Committee to report the criminal or civil misconduct of bar members.
56. These bar association and judicial commissions have regulatory bodies (which have no
criminal jurisdiction or powers to prosecute or investigate criminal acts), which are then
supposed to review the victims complaints and report any criminal misconduct they find to
the proper criminal authorities for investigation.
57. If they find criminal misconduct and fail to report the felonies alleged the loophole to evade
justice is fulfilled, as no criminal investigations are instituted because they have been
blocked. Every once in a while an attorney may be disbarred or a judge suspended when
they are involved in criminal misconduct but no criminal prosecution of them is made and
the victim is left helpless with no due process for the crimes against them.
58. If the victims turn back to criminal authorities after the regulatory agencies determine no
cause to investigate the complaint, law enforcement then states that the agencies did not find
wrong doing and that they do not want to review the matter as it will be taken to a prosecutor
member of the Florida Bar in the end who will review and work with the State Bar and thus
the effort will be futile.
59. That Eliot states that victims should never seek State Bar sanctions or disbarment of the
attorneys who have committed crimes against them and only work with criminal authorities
who are often not associated with the Florida Bar, as there is nothing sexier in a prison
environment than a lawyer with a license who everyone wants as a cellie at night to do his
pleadings and so disbarment for criminal acts of lawyers is not good, as if a lawyer is guilty
of a criminal act against a client, it would serve well the victim to know that the lawyer is not
only criminally charged, prosecuted and sentenced but that he is then being worked to death
while serving his sentence in the pen by everyone who needs a lawyer in jail.
60. This “Get Out of Jail Free” card that lawyers and judges have written themselves by creating
the state bar associations and disciplinary departments to have regulatory power over their
members in ethical and criminal complaints filed by citizens and whistleblowers and move
the matters to their organization for improper adjudication is unconstitutional.
61. This perversion of the system allows bar members who commit felony acts to be first
reviewed by the bar association and determinations made that can evade criminal authorities,
such as intentionally failing to report the criminal acts of their members in victim complaints
(Misprision of a Felony or Aiding and Abetting) to criminal authorities and this directly
impacts the victims’ rights to fair and impartial due process of parties that committed
criminal acts against them.
62. The complaints get moved from criminal authorities to the very organization where the
complained members are beholden to for their livelihoods and who may be part of the
organized criminal element within the bar association and regulatory body and this is like
going to the Gestapo and complaining camp guards are beating you and anticipating justice
will be served and the guards will now treat you with respect.
63. ANY OTHER AMERICAN without legal title who has to face criminal authorities for
crimes alleged against them by a victim have no place or organization they are members of
that they can go to and try and wiggle out of criminal misconduct by the organization they
belong to failing to pursue criminal misconduct against them by failing to report the crimes
and instead charge them with a slap on the wrist with useless disciplinary sanction,
suspension from profession such as disbarment and evade criminal prosecution.
64. The state bars are NOT a law enforcement agency. This ability to evade criminal authorities
and punishments creates unequal protections in the application of law and places certain
parties above the law and getting preferential treatment, while denying their victims fair and
impartial due process.
65. Florida Bar members should be conflicted out from investigating any another attorney who is
a member of the Florida Bar, which is a patent denial of due process through conflict that
obstructs justice and creates an overwhelming Appearance of Impropriety to the general
public that lawyers and judges are untouchable or immune to the criminal misconduct they
do and the reason lawyers and judges have the lowest approval rating of any professional
organization in America next to Congress (again made up primarily by attorneys at law.)
66. The self-policing aspect of the Florida Bar becomes even more inherently biased, conflicted
and unjust when the complaint is made by another Florida Bar member against another
Florida Bar member that is connected and the investigator is yet another connected Florida
Bar regulatory member. In this instance, the lawyer complaining can be threatened with
disbarment the ole Hollywood mob line modified to, “you’ll never practice or rule in this
state again,” forcing them to give up their complaint or go against the organization that holds
their livelihood and be destroyed.
67. The same inherent conflict of interest that exists with the Florida Bar also exists with the
Judicial Qualifications Commission. Florida Bar members again regulate Judges, who are
other Florida Bar members when a Florida Bar member whistleblower or a victim of judicial
injustice files a complaint against a Florida State Judge with the Judicial Qualifications
Commission.
68. For these reasons Florida Bar members and the Florida Bar are inherently conflicted from
handling any aspect of Eliot’s Whistleblower matters or other civil actions due to these
conflicts from Eliot’s pursuit of the organization that conflict him with every member,
whether they are directly involved or not, as Eliot cannot know which members are involved
in the conspiracy against him due to the secretive nature of a conspiracies members who
conceal their criminal intent or know who the good lawyers trying to help him who are then
being threatened to drop his matters or else.
69. Due to the inherent conflict in the Florida Bar self-policing its members, it has manifested
into an criminal protection agency composed of reprobate attorneys who threaten and extort
members and victims who play by the rules seeking justice and protection and where it is in
no way a consumer protection agency in the way it operates.
70. That due to Eliot’s exposing reprobate members of the Florida Bar, he is also perusing
attorneys at law and judges in three states and their bar associations (PA, NY & VA) and
Eliot’s complaints allege collusion by a host of judges and he is now being legally abused by
misuse of the Florida Probate courts and aided and abetted by the courts acting as accomplice
and facilitator to ongoing crimes against him in Florida and this Court.
71. All of these new crimes taking place in this Court and the Florida Probate court are again
done by reprobate attorneys at law and all intended to deprive Eliot of his properties by legal
schemes and disabling his rights, including his right to counsel (as everyone of over 100
lawyers contacted to help him have declined, most expressing fear of retribution by their bar
associations or stating it was too complicated to sue attorneys.)
72. After the Candice Schwager, Esq. warning call, no attorneys after learning of that even want
to talk about representation, as if telling them about the car bombing up front does not scare
them away. After the call, Schwagger had to decline further representation to Eliot’s minor
children as she too is fearful of retribution and now suffering from the legal process abuse
directed at her for efforts to expose the corruption and truly help and provide justice to
victims.
73. Eliot, his wife Candice and their minor children are all afraid for their lives and in need of
immediate protections. All court proceedings in all Florida court cases should be
immediately stayed by this Court while they are transferred to this Court to prevent further
mis-adjudication, Fraud on the court, Fraud in the court and Fraud by the court and to prevent
further criminal activities from occurring against Eliot.
74. Eliot also seeks this Court to federally intervene in all prosecutorial and criminal
investigations due to the influence on these agencies by members of the Florida Bar and
Florida Supreme Court who Eliot is suing and pursuing in criminal and civil complaints filed
with state and federal agencies and to ensure and provide conflict free investigations and
prosecutions.
75. Eliot is pursuing all of the following parties that are members of the Florida Bar, Florida
Supreme Court and other reprobate bar members acting in private practices (and this is only a
partial list in Florida and Eliot has three other similar states he sued with a similar cast of
criminals in each.
Properties theft, including but not limited to the following Defendants sued in the RICO
filed. These bar members were public officials involved at the time of filing the RICO in the
cover up and subsequent crimes: ''
Source and Lot's More
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMjlfV2lDNmNJdHM/edit
crimes being committed against his family, which once again are crimes again done primarily
by attorneys at law and judges acting in conspiracy against Eliot’s rights and designed to deny him
his inheritances and where the crimes now include the alleged murder of Simon
(alleged by Ted the day his father died.)
42. That Eliot alleges that the theft of the insurance policy that is the subject of the lawsuit before
this Court is yet further retaliation to deny him expectancies, where Eliot was initially NOT
told of this lawsuit and was not made party to the original complaint and is yet another effort
to steal the estate property and deny him inheritances through fraud committed again by
attorneys at law, Donald R. Tescher, Esq. and his junior partner Robert L. Spallina, Esq., in
concert with Ted, designed to steal millions of dollars of monies for Eliot’s family.
43. This insurance policy theft scheme is to further disable any chance of Eliot getting monies,
which could be used to get counsel to defend his family’s inheritance (he has not received a
dollar from the Estates and Trusts in over two years due to frauds committed that have
delayed their expectancies) and where the inheritance could also be used to pursue his and
others Intellectual Property rights and his RICO, feed his children and more.
44. Eliot and his family were wholly dependent on their inheritances for income as Simon had
set up elaborate estate plans for Eliot’s family to continue to receive monthly income that
Simon and Shirley Bernstein had set up and begun many years before their deaths to protect
Eliot and his family due to the dangerous situation their lives became entangled in and their
inability to seek employment with the onslaught against them.
45. The danger prevented Eliot from gaining employment, as not many employers want to hire
people who have bombs put in their cars and are in the middle of complex RICO litigation
and these funds Simon and Shirley set up paid for all basic living and household expenses for
the home that Eliot’s children own, private school tuitions for the children and all of their other expenses and needs, including but not limited to Health Insurance, Food, Clothing,
Entertainment, etc.
46. That Simon had set up continuation of these payments to occur long into the future upon his
death through his Estate plans and took many precautions to make sure Eliot and his family
would have no problems once he died with income to survive many years and through all the
children’s college educations. That the hijacking and theft of these funds via the crimes in
the probate court are fully intended to cause grave harm and damage to Eliot to keep him
from pursuing his whistleblowing efforts.
47. That Eliot must now protect his family without help from authorities who have been virtually
silent for years on ongoing investigations and silent since being noticed regarding the recent
threat of imminent danger to his family made by a licensed attorney at law, Schwager, and
where Eliot alleges this delay may also be intentional and created by lawyers who are in
prosecutorial roles and controlled by the law firms that are against Eliot, in direct efforts to
deny Eliot and his family state and federal protections.
48. However, it appears that wherever attorneys at law in whatever role they play (private
attorneys, prosecutors, judges, etc.) become involved in Eliot’s life there is no relief and in
fact further retaliations and denials of due process and procedure to Obstruct any chance at
Justice. Hence, there should be an Injunctive Relief that: 1) the Bar Associations or any of
the judges against whom the whistle is being blown on cannot take any action against Eliot or
his family for publishing the truth and 2) the courts must refrain from restricting our
pleadings and motions to protect the innocent.
Wherefore, Eliot request that Eliot be designated with the status of a Whistleblower
and afford all the state and federal Whistleblower protections and provide federal witness
protection.
STAY OF ALL PROCEEDINGS IN THE FLORIDA PROBATE COURT AND
TRANSFER OF ALL FLORIDA PROBATE MATTERS TO THIS COURT
49. The denial of due process, equal protection and obstruction of justice and retaliatory acts
proliferate because the Florida Bar protects the corruption and criminal actions of its
members instead of holding them accountable and issuing strong sanctions as it appears the
enterprise has infiltrated any agency that can investigate them and their self-policing Bar
Association.
50. The Bar Association’s reprobate attorneys at law in charge of disciplinary sanctions against
members appears steeped in corruption and is used to retaliate against honest members doing
the right thing by reporting the corruption they witness that they are duty bound under Oath
of G-d to report and instead promote the bad actor members reported who are acting outside
the color of law for personal gain and who aid and abet the racketeering enterprise.
51. Victims who are turned to the Florida Bar for relief when they report civil, ethical and
criminal misconduct of attorneys at law and judges are subjected to the same retaliatory acts
by the Florida Bar as their member whistleblowers and in giving their complaint information
to the Florida Bar they have basically turned their evidence over to those they are
complaining against as the Florida Bar then gives that information to the accused parties and
again this deprives rights to victims ingrained in traditional investigations.
52. The Florida Bar then typically issues letters to victims of how they reviewed the matters and
found no cause to investigate further and that you owe your attorney fees or words to that
effect. In Eliot’s case, the goodbye good luck letters were found to be written by or aided by
Proskauer Rose attorneys who were violating Florida Bar rules by interfering in the
complaints filed against their firm, which is what led to the investigations in New York and
that led Eliot to the Florida Supreme Court and then the US Supreme Court, where it appears
the attorney protections go all the way up the chain, as neither would review the bar
associations misconduct and thus no remedy avails victims.
53. There is a conflict of interest inherent in the Florida Bar’s self-disciplinary regulatory body
policy for how can a state organization regulate itself and its members and skirt traditional
discipline from criminal investigation, as the bar association disciplinary agencies cannot
investigate or regulate the criminal misconduct of its members and only investigate their
ethical misconduct and sanction or disbar them.
54. The self-policing policy of the Florida Bar does not work – Florida Bar members cannot
unbiasedly investigate the actions of other Florida Bar members and victims complaining
about their members or be counted on to report them to criminal authorities when necessary,
as a protection of brethren members is inherent.
55. Therefore, a loophole in justice is created whereby lawyers committing crimes may evade
criminal prosecution if the state bar fails to contact criminal authorities to investigate claims
made by victims that involve criminal elements and this covers up the felony misconduct
instead. When citizens have complaints, criminal or civil, against judges, prosecutors and private
attorneys at law they are directed by law enforcement to contact the Florida Bar or the
Judicial Qualification Committee to report the criminal or civil misconduct of bar members.
56. These bar association and judicial commissions have regulatory bodies (which have no
criminal jurisdiction or powers to prosecute or investigate criminal acts), which are then
supposed to review the victims complaints and report any criminal misconduct they find to
the proper criminal authorities for investigation.
57. If they find criminal misconduct and fail to report the felonies alleged the loophole to evade
justice is fulfilled, as no criminal investigations are instituted because they have been
blocked. Every once in a while an attorney may be disbarred or a judge suspended when
they are involved in criminal misconduct but no criminal prosecution of them is made and
the victim is left helpless with no due process for the crimes against them.
58. If the victims turn back to criminal authorities after the regulatory agencies determine no
cause to investigate the complaint, law enforcement then states that the agencies did not find
wrong doing and that they do not want to review the matter as it will be taken to a prosecutor
member of the Florida Bar in the end who will review and work with the State Bar and thus
the effort will be futile.
59. That Eliot states that victims should never seek State Bar sanctions or disbarment of the
attorneys who have committed crimes against them and only work with criminal authorities
who are often not associated with the Florida Bar, as there is nothing sexier in a prison
environment than a lawyer with a license who everyone wants as a cellie at night to do his
pleadings and so disbarment for criminal acts of lawyers is not good, as if a lawyer is guilty
of a criminal act against a client, it would serve well the victim to know that the lawyer is not
only criminally charged, prosecuted and sentenced but that he is then being worked to death
while serving his sentence in the pen by everyone who needs a lawyer in jail.
60. This “Get Out of Jail Free” card that lawyers and judges have written themselves by creating
the state bar associations and disciplinary departments to have regulatory power over their
members in ethical and criminal complaints filed by citizens and whistleblowers and move
the matters to their organization for improper adjudication is unconstitutional.
61. This perversion of the system allows bar members who commit felony acts to be first
reviewed by the bar association and determinations made that can evade criminal authorities,
such as intentionally failing to report the criminal acts of their members in victim complaints
(Misprision of a Felony or Aiding and Abetting) to criminal authorities and this directly
impacts the victims’ rights to fair and impartial due process of parties that committed
criminal acts against them.
62. The complaints get moved from criminal authorities to the very organization where the
complained members are beholden to for their livelihoods and who may be part of the
organized criminal element within the bar association and regulatory body and this is like
going to the Gestapo and complaining camp guards are beating you and anticipating justice
will be served and the guards will now treat you with respect.
63. ANY OTHER AMERICAN without legal title who has to face criminal authorities for
crimes alleged against them by a victim have no place or organization they are members of
that they can go to and try and wiggle out of criminal misconduct by the organization they
belong to failing to pursue criminal misconduct against them by failing to report the crimes
and instead charge them with a slap on the wrist with useless disciplinary sanction,
suspension from profession such as disbarment and evade criminal prosecution.
64. The state bars are NOT a law enforcement agency. This ability to evade criminal authorities
and punishments creates unequal protections in the application of law and places certain
parties above the law and getting preferential treatment, while denying their victims fair and
impartial due process.
65. Florida Bar members should be conflicted out from investigating any another attorney who is
a member of the Florida Bar, which is a patent denial of due process through conflict that
obstructs justice and creates an overwhelming Appearance of Impropriety to the general
public that lawyers and judges are untouchable or immune to the criminal misconduct they
do and the reason lawyers and judges have the lowest approval rating of any professional
organization in America next to Congress (again made up primarily by attorneys at law.)
66. The self-policing aspect of the Florida Bar becomes even more inherently biased, conflicted
and unjust when the complaint is made by another Florida Bar member against another
Florida Bar member that is connected and the investigator is yet another connected Florida
Bar regulatory member. In this instance, the lawyer complaining can be threatened with
disbarment the ole Hollywood mob line modified to, “you’ll never practice or rule in this
state again,” forcing them to give up their complaint or go against the organization that holds
their livelihood and be destroyed.
67. The same inherent conflict of interest that exists with the Florida Bar also exists with the
Judicial Qualifications Commission. Florida Bar members again regulate Judges, who are
other Florida Bar members when a Florida Bar member whistleblower or a victim of judicial
injustice files a complaint against a Florida State Judge with the Judicial Qualifications
Commission.
68. For these reasons Florida Bar members and the Florida Bar are inherently conflicted from
handling any aspect of Eliot’s Whistleblower matters or other civil actions due to these
conflicts from Eliot’s pursuit of the organization that conflict him with every member,
whether they are directly involved or not, as Eliot cannot know which members are involved
in the conspiracy against him due to the secretive nature of a conspiracies members who
conceal their criminal intent or know who the good lawyers trying to help him who are then
being threatened to drop his matters or else.
69. Due to the inherent conflict in the Florida Bar self-policing its members, it has manifested
into an criminal protection agency composed of reprobate attorneys who threaten and extort
members and victims who play by the rules seeking justice and protection and where it is in
no way a consumer protection agency in the way it operates.
70. That due to Eliot’s exposing reprobate members of the Florida Bar, he is also perusing
attorneys at law and judges in three states and their bar associations (PA, NY & VA) and
Eliot’s complaints allege collusion by a host of judges and he is now being legally abused by
misuse of the Florida Probate courts and aided and abetted by the courts acting as accomplice
and facilitator to ongoing crimes against him in Florida and this Court.
71. All of these new crimes taking place in this Court and the Florida Probate court are again
done by reprobate attorneys at law and all intended to deprive Eliot of his properties by legal
schemes and disabling his rights, including his right to counsel (as everyone of over 100
lawyers contacted to help him have declined, most expressing fear of retribution by their bar
associations or stating it was too complicated to sue attorneys.)
72. After the Candice Schwager, Esq. warning call, no attorneys after learning of that even want
to talk about representation, as if telling them about the car bombing up front does not scare
them away. After the call, Schwagger had to decline further representation to Eliot’s minor
children as she too is fearful of retribution and now suffering from the legal process abuse
directed at her for efforts to expose the corruption and truly help and provide justice to
victims.
73. Eliot, his wife Candice and their minor children are all afraid for their lives and in need of
immediate protections. All court proceedings in all Florida court cases should be
immediately stayed by this Court while they are transferred to this Court to prevent further
mis-adjudication, Fraud on the court, Fraud in the court and Fraud by the court and to prevent
further criminal activities from occurring against Eliot.
74. Eliot also seeks this Court to federally intervene in all prosecutorial and criminal
investigations due to the influence on these agencies by members of the Florida Bar and
Florida Supreme Court who Eliot is suing and pursuing in criminal and civil complaints filed
with state and federal agencies and to ensure and provide conflict free investigations and
prosecutions.
75. Eliot is pursuing all of the following parties that are members of the Florida Bar, Florida
Supreme Court and other reprobate bar members acting in private practices (and this is only a
partial list in Florida and Eliot has three other similar states he sued with a similar cast of
criminals in each.
Properties theft, including but not limited to the following Defendants sued in the RICO
filed. These bar members were public officials involved at the time of filing the RICO in the
cover up and subsequent crimes: ''
Source and Lot's More
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMjlfV2lDNmNJdHM/edit
Oppenheimer - No Need for Signed Trusts, Just Give us your MONEY. Judge Martin Colin Florida Probate,
''196. Judge Colin allows Trusts for minors to be operated by a Trustee, Oppenheimer, without
ANY SIGNATURE PAGES28 and improperly executed and asks Eliot in hearing what
statute prohibits a bank trust company from operating Trusts without signature pages or
opening an account (in a different name than on the trust) and using such funds without a
signed Trust instrument. When Eliot responded to Colin stating fraud as the statute, Colin
states it is not enough and overruled an accounting objection to the Trust accounting claiming
Oppenheimer operated without legal documents, and accessed an account with a different
name than that on the trust that has no signature pages.
197. Again this raises red flags as to Colin’s competency and his acts to try and further cover up
for the officers and fiduciaries he appointed, Oppenheimer, who once again are caught in
what appears an alleged massive fraud and again Colin fails to notify the authorities of the
possible criminal acts this bank fraud depicts and yet entertains guardianship hearings filed
by Steven A. Lessne, Esq., (“LESSNE”) the attorney for Oppenheimer, who is a counter defendant
in Eliot’s counter complaint against Oppenheimer which has been stayed by Colin
and yet LESSNE continues to represent other parties despite his conflict.
198. That it should be noted by the Court that LESSNE began his representation of Oppenheimer
at the law firm GrayRobinson, P.A. and then after Eliot counter sued LESSNE and Gray
Robinson, LESSNE then transferred with the Oppenheimer case, to ROSE’s former law firm
Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A. (“GUNSTER”)
199. That GUNSTER is the former law firm of Christopher Wheeler, Esq., the central defendant
in Eliot’s RICO claims of theft of the Intellectual Properties, who was formerly with
Proskauer Rose until resigning and going to work at GEO Corporation, the private prison
company that incarcerates people for profit as their stock value is dependent on the number
of prisoners incarcerated.
200. Again Colin protects the officer of his Court LESSNE that he appointed and shields him
from criminal investigation of him and his client while allowing hearings of contempt and
guardianship issues filed by LESSNE as retaliation to proceed forward.
201. Judge Colin allegedly transferred Trusteeship of the three minor children’s trusts in 2010 and
without reviewing the 3 trusts which are not attached to the Petition filed29, which have no
signatures pages for Daniel, which have conflicting trustees and a Successor named Larry
Bishens, Esq. and are improperly executed, which he would have seen these glaring
problems had he reviewed the Trusts prior to allegedly transferring Trusteeship to
Oppenheimer based on what appear more fraudulent and forged documents.
OPPENHEIMER TRUST THEY POSITED WITH COURT AS DOCUMENT THEY ARE OPERATING ON FOR xx BERNSTEIN MISSING SIGNATURE PAGES!
http://www.iviewit.tv/Simon%20and%20Shirley%20Estate/Exhibit%20C%20Oppenheimer%20Criminal%20Complaint%20PBSO%20-%20Trust%20Daniel.pdf
29 Alleged Fraudulent and Forged Petition to Change Trustee of Children Trusts
http://www.iviewit.tv/Simon%20and%20Shirley%20Estate/20100619AllegedForgedEliotCandicePetitiontoAppointSuccessorTrusteeJoshuaJacobandDaniel.pdf
Source and Lot's More
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMjlfV2lDNmNJdHM/edit
ANY SIGNATURE PAGES28 and improperly executed and asks Eliot in hearing what
statute prohibits a bank trust company from operating Trusts without signature pages or
opening an account (in a different name than on the trust) and using such funds without a
signed Trust instrument. When Eliot responded to Colin stating fraud as the statute, Colin
states it is not enough and overruled an accounting objection to the Trust accounting claiming
Oppenheimer operated without legal documents, and accessed an account with a different
name than that on the trust that has no signature pages.
197. Again this raises red flags as to Colin’s competency and his acts to try and further cover up
for the officers and fiduciaries he appointed, Oppenheimer, who once again are caught in
what appears an alleged massive fraud and again Colin fails to notify the authorities of the
possible criminal acts this bank fraud depicts and yet entertains guardianship hearings filed
by Steven A. Lessne, Esq., (“LESSNE”) the attorney for Oppenheimer, who is a counter defendant
in Eliot’s counter complaint against Oppenheimer which has been stayed by Colin
and yet LESSNE continues to represent other parties despite his conflict.
198. That it should be noted by the Court that LESSNE began his representation of Oppenheimer
at the law firm GrayRobinson, P.A. and then after Eliot counter sued LESSNE and Gray
Robinson, LESSNE then transferred with the Oppenheimer case, to ROSE’s former law firm
Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A. (“GUNSTER”)
199. That GUNSTER is the former law firm of Christopher Wheeler, Esq., the central defendant
in Eliot’s RICO claims of theft of the Intellectual Properties, who was formerly with
Proskauer Rose until resigning and going to work at GEO Corporation, the private prison
company that incarcerates people for profit as their stock value is dependent on the number
of prisoners incarcerated.
200. Again Colin protects the officer of his Court LESSNE that he appointed and shields him
from criminal investigation of him and his client while allowing hearings of contempt and
guardianship issues filed by LESSNE as retaliation to proceed forward.
201. Judge Colin allegedly transferred Trusteeship of the three minor children’s trusts in 2010 and
without reviewing the 3 trusts which are not attached to the Petition filed29, which have no
signatures pages for Daniel, which have conflicting trustees and a Successor named Larry
Bishens, Esq. and are improperly executed, which he would have seen these glaring
problems had he reviewed the Trusts prior to allegedly transferring Trusteeship to
Oppenheimer based on what appear more fraudulent and forged documents.
OPPENHEIMER TRUST THEY POSITED WITH COURT AS DOCUMENT THEY ARE OPERATING ON FOR xx BERNSTEIN MISSING SIGNATURE PAGES!
http://www.iviewit.tv/Simon%20and%20Shirley%20Estate/Exhibit%20C%20Oppenheimer%20Criminal%20Complaint%20PBSO%20-%20Trust%20Daniel.pdf
29 Alleged Fraudulent and Forged Petition to Change Trustee of Children Trusts
http://www.iviewit.tv/Simon%20and%20Shirley%20Estate/20100619AllegedForgedEliotCandicePetitiontoAppointSuccessorTrusteeJoshuaJacobandDaniel.pdf
Source and Lot's More
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMjlfV2lDNmNJdHM/edit
Florida Corruption; Patent Theft; RICO; Judge Martin Colin, Ted Bernstein, Attorney Alan Rose, Florida Probate Court, Illinois Insurance Fraud, Deceased signing probate documents, alleged murder and lots' more..
FEDERAL PROTECTION FROM LIFE-THREATENING DANGER TO ELIOT AND
WHISTLEBLOWER, CONTINUATION OF RICO ACTIVITIES AFTER PRIOR
FAMILY MINIVAN CAR BOMBING, PRIOR THREATS, SCHEME TO DENY PROPER
HIS FAMILY VIA NEW THREATS OF PHYSICAL DANGER ACTING AS
MONETIZATION OF INVENTIONS, DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS
AND PROCEDURE THAT IS OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE.
1. That Eliot has previously filed a RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit before Honorable Judge
Shira A. Scheindlin, 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department
Disciplinary Committee, et al. and these matters and the criminal elements both proven and
alleged herein appear to be continuations of those crimes by similar and related parties
mostly reprobate attorneys at law. That Eliot filed an Amended Complaint1
this Court can review those records from that case for more information regarding how the
Iviewit matters tie in to many significant events in US History, including the Bush v Gore
election fraud and Supreme Court nomination in a 5-4 vote for President, the collapse of
Enron and more.
2. That Scheindlin in her err filed dismissal of the RICO2
case as defined at the time.
3. Eliot has recently come under new and continued life threatening danger and severe duress
and seeks this Court’s urgent protection from his Whistleblowing efforts on attorneys at law acting outside the color of law in Florida, in a variety of titles, as judges, prosecutors, private
attorneys, state bar disciplinary agent and more. This danger is evidenced by all the
following ongoing issues in the life of Eliot and his family.
4. Massive recent further fraud and other crimes against Eliot and his family, primarily
committed by attorneys at law, with court escalation of retaliation and denial of due process
and procedure against Eliot that obstructs justice, intentionally and with scienter, to interfere
with expectancies/inheritance for Eliot and his minor children and this retaliation due to his
exposing and having reported to prosecutors and criminal authorities attorneys at law
involved directly in crimes committed in, on and by the Florida Probate court and its Florida
Bar members. Eliot and his family are subjected to domestic terrorism under 18 U.S.C. §
2331 and crimes against Humanity.
5. It appears there is a domestic terrorist organization operating with the legal system, where a
mob styled infiltration has occurred at the highest level in the legal system, using the courts
as their business addresses to facilitate their crimes and operate a human trafficking scheme
through guardianships that rob the victims of their legal rights and theft and money
laundering through the probate courts to steal families properties upon the death of their
loved ones. The courts abuse of process creates a mob styled racketeering enterprise
committed under a tainted color of law in the State of Florida that is given cover by the
Florida Bar, which protects its reprobate members who are part of the scheme and artifice to
defraud citizens.
6. A victim is targeted in the Probate/Guardianship court, their assets then stolen after they are
dead in probate or while still living through guardianships of unlawful chicanery designed to
bleed their victims assets as they are slowly put to their death by illegal court “edicts”,
stripped of legal right through illegal legal custody gained and then defenseless stripped of
their assets and isolated from their family members who get in the way.
7. The officers of the Florida Probate court in Eliot’s parents probate and trusts matters were
caught and have admitted to their law firm committing felony criminal acts, including but not
limited to, proven Post Mortem Fraudulent Alteration and Notarization of Court documents
and Dispositive documents posited with the court as a Fraud on the Court, Post Mortem
Admitted Forgeries of documents for decedents Simon and Shirley and other living parties
including Eliot, numerous past and ongoing Frauds on the court and multiple Frauds
committed against Beneficiaries of the estates and trusts. Further they are undergoing
investigations for other crimes not yet proven but formally alleged, including but not limited
to, Insurance Fraud, Fraud on a Creditor, Fraud on a Federal Court (this Court), Mail and
Wire Fraud, Theft of Estate and Trust Assets, Conversion, Extortion, alleged Murder of
Simon Bernstein by Plaintiff Theodore Bernstein and more.
8. Eliot’s exposure of and objections to the court corruption and his filings with criminal
authorities for acts committed by these attorneys at law, operating as officers and fiduciaries
of the probate courts of Judge Martin Colin, Esq. (“Colin”) and Judge David E. French, Esq.
(“French”) , has been covered up and further aided and abetted by the judges of the Florida
Probate court, which are facilitating these highly sophisticated illegal legal crimes under the
guise of probate proceedings and providing cover for the reprobate attorneys who were
caught.
9. These harms are caused by the very courts that should be upholding Eliot’s rights and
protecting him, especially after he cleaned house for the judges by exposing the bad faith acts
of Florida attorneys at law practicing before their courts, the officers appointed by the courts,
who were found acting in concert to Fraud the court and commit a variety of crimes against
the Beneficiaries, these crimes primarily targeting Eliot.
10. Why Eliot? Eliot was joined together in 2008 with American Hero Whistleblower, New
York Supreme Court Appellate Division Departmental Disciplinary Committee attorney at
law, Christine C. Anderson, Esq., by Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin who legally related
Eliot’s RICO case involving a massive corruption inside government and almost all
attributable to those with legal degrees, to Anderson’s riveting Whistleblower lawsuit that
exposed a criminal cartel operating at the highest levels of the country’s legal system and
protected by the self-regulating failed attorney at law disciplinary departments they
controlled.
11. That Scheindlin related several other Whistleblower citizens fighting the corruption in the
courts for many years together with Anderson and so began a lengthy and ongoing effort to
expose the corruption that plagues our nation by a small group of very dedicated citizens who
fearlessly took on the corruption machine inside the courts, at great personal and familial
costs.
12. That after finding out how the innards of this corruption scheme worked whereby criminals
disguised as attorneys at law are violating law with impunity, it was apparent that they have
seized the keys to the kingdom at the highest outposts of law and turned a country built on
law into lawlessness society.
13. This has created an unprecedented situation in our country, a coup d'état of the legal system
and everything it controls and now requiring unprecedented actions by both citizens and a
brave few lawyers and judges who are willing to stand up in their roles as honorable and duty
bound to justice attorneys at law and bust up this racket that threatens our nation by turning
in those reprobate members who are acting outside the color of law, despite the consequences
against them by those in control of their profession at this time, unafraid of the retaliation
they most certainly will face.
14. Eliot has recently met even more brave Whistleblower attorneys at law, upholding their oaths
to report the misconduct of their brethren, although these are false brethren, as they are really
criminals using law to commit crime and cover them up, using the courts as retaliatory
weapons against the victims and the retaliation of these lawyers who have done nothing
wrong but fulfill their duty to report other members misconduct is swift and vicious.
15. Joining Anderson’s heroic whistleblowing are now Barbara Stone, Esq., Candice Schwager,
Esq., Joanne Denison, Esq., Kenneth Ditkowski, Esq., Kevin R. Hall, Esq. and Dean Loren,
Esq. and other attorney Whistleblowers who are all exposing the illegally formed bar
associations and the crimes in the court they have witnessed firsthand. Now they are in
danger of losing their livelihoods and being viciously retaliated against for their exposure of
the bad actors by what at first glance appears lawyers, judges, prosecutors and the bar
associations and with deeper inspection one finds they are lawbreakers misusing law to target
their victims.
16. There is also another citizen, William Windsor, who has been jailed for his efforts to
expose the public office corruption in the nation by assembling video of nationwide victims
and again Mr. Windsor’s only crime is that of exposing the underbelly of the legal system
through the eyes of victims. http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php
17. The reprobate attorneys are acting to commit crimes in various combinations of racketeering
type fraudulent illegal legal schemes that utilize the courts as host to the crimes and using the
their legal degrees to commit these crimes and then having other criminals disguised as
lawyers planted in the regulatory agencies to cover them up for them, with virtually no fear
of retribution, as the cover up is at the highest levels of the failed self-policing attorney at law
failed Disciplinary Departments, State Bars, Judicial Conduct Commissions and criminal
prosecutorial agencies.
18. The self-policing bar associations and the judicial qualifications commissions instead of
protecting the Whistleblowers exposing their reprobate members and investigating the
complaints filed by the Whistleblowers and citizen victims reporting the misconduct of
judges to them are instead retaliated against.
19. Retaliation against the Whistleblower members of the Florida Bar who are reporting against
other members of the bar committing the crimes include extortionary threats of disbarment
used in efforts to force these brave and heroic whistleblowers from pursuing their acts to
expose the bad actors or else.
20. Further the state bar associations and judicial conduct commissions are denying due process
and procedure of the attorney at law Whistleblowers by disbarring them and preventing and
dismantling their efforts to protect their clients, themselves, their families and the public at
large from the dangers of the reprobate attorneys at law, judges and prosecutors they are
exposing who have corrupted and polluted the legal system, casting a grave appearance of
impropriety over the whole system of jurisprudence and leaving no one capable of putting it
down.
21. The danger to Eliot directly is further evidenced by Eliot and his wife Candice’s receipt of a
phone call at 4am. on April 11, 2015 by his children’s counsel, Candice Schwager, Esq. of
Texas, informing him that their lives were in imminent danger for their whistleblowing
efforts against judicial and attorney at law corruption and to instantly seek federal and state
protections. This phone call and the following actions with state and federal authorities
already involved in Eliot’s life is documented below by attorney at law Barbara Stone, Esq.
who also received a similar call from Candice Schwagger, Esq.:
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 7:07 AM
To: Michael Horowitz [Inspector General @ US DOJ OIG] ~ Partner @ Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft LLP (michael.horowitz@cwt.com ); 'The Honorable Glenn Alan Fine, Inspector General ~
Cc: 'Barbara Stone (bstone575@gmail.com )'; 'JoAnne M. Denison Esq. @ Denison & Associates,
From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein [mailto:iviewit@iviewit.tv ]
Department of Justice'
PC (jdenison@surfree.com )'; Candice Schwager @ Schwager Law Firm
(candiceschwager@icloud.com ); 'Andrew Dietz @ Rock-It Cargo USA, Inc.
(andyd@rockitcargo.com )'; 'CANDICE BERNSTEIN (tourcandy@gmail.com )'; 'Caroline
Prochotska Rogers Esq. (caroline@cprogers.com )'; 'Eliot I. Bernstein (iviewit@iviewit.tv )'; 'Marc
R. Garber Esq. (marcrgarber@gmail.com )'; 'Marc R. Garber Esq. @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.
(marc.garber@flastergreenberg.com) '; 'Michele M. Mulrooney ~ Partner @ Venable LLP
(mmulrooney@Venable.com )'
Subject: Eliot Bernstein. FW: We have been warned by counsel that we are in danger and need
of Federal protection
Dear Inspector General Horowitz, please add this email to my ongoing case file with DOJ OIG. As
this involves further potential dangers to my family, where it has been alleged my father was
murdered and a Coroner’s report reveals several elevated heavy metals, I take this warning very
seriously, especially where I have uncovered and proven fraud and forgeries of deceased parties
to gain Dominion and Control of my deceased father’s estate, the crimes committed by
Attorneys at Law. I have been trying to contact the FBI for several months to report several very
serious crimes that require federal investigations and have supposedly contacted the FBI who
refused to give me names of the people that were supposed to be doing the intake and have not
heard back from them at all. I have tried to contact your offices and similarly I was unable to
confirm anyone’s name that I was speaking to and if in fact you had gotten my messages. Please
feel free to contact me at my numbers below. Eliot
Eliot I. Bernstein
Inventor
From: Eliot Bernstein [mailto:iviewit5@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 6:57 AM
To: 'Detective Andrew Panzer @ Palm Beach County Sheriff (PanzerA@pbso.org)'
Subject: Eliot Bernstein. FW: We have been warned by counsel that we are in danger and need
of Federal protection
Dear Detective Panzer, please add this to the ongoing investigation of my family estate and trust
matters. Barbara Stone is a Florida Attorney who is exposing Judicial Corruption. I got a call at
4am from attorney Candice Schwager who informed me and Candice my wife that our lives and
those of our children were in imminent danger for our Whistleblowing efforts. This warning
came from a licensed attorney. Paul Wright is at the FBI according to Barbara. I was told to
contact state and federal authorities for protection. Eliot
From: barbara stone [mailto:bstone575@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 7:36 PM
To: Paul Wright
Cc: Eliot Bernstein; Candice Schwager, Esq.; JoAnne M Denison, Esq.
Subject: We have been warned by counsel that we are in danger and need of Federal protection
My attorney, Candice Schwager who is also the attorney for Eliot Bernstein contacted
both of us on or about 4:00 am EST on Saturday and advised us to contact Federal
authorities for protection.
She warned me and Eliot Bernstein that we and our families are in danger and in need of
immediate Federal protection due to our efforts to expose judicial corruption.
22. That this wakeup call warning of imminent danger and to get the children protected by a
licensed Attorney at Law has left Eliot and his wife Candice panicked and frantic for the last
two plus weeks trying to get help and keep an eye on the children at the same time and left
them hardly able to keep up with the sudden increased legal hearings and pleadings dumped
on them as the pressure is mounting on the bad actors from the criminal acts being uncovered
in the courts.
23. These sharp practices of heaping hearing after hearing on Eliot seems calculated to heighten
the pressure on them intentionally in the six legal cases involving the Estates and Trusts of
Eliot’s deceased parents, Simon and Shirley as pressure mounts and their crimes are further
uncovered and reported on.
24. Many of the legal actions require strict deadlines, there are a mass of scheduled hearings,
hearings of Eliot’s changed overnight and moved up a month by Judge Colin on his own
initiative with demands that Eliot be present at that time or else lose his rights regarding
complicated accounting proceedings, where thousands of pages of documents were dumped
on him without giving him the opportunity to review them before the hearing and all this
coming as Eliot and others are finding out about a plethora of crimes committed by the
attorneys at law, fiduciaries and other parties involved in the Estates and Trust cases of
Simon and Shirley Bernstein.
25. That the court will again take note that it was alleged by Ted Bernstein and Pamela Simon on
the day Simon died that he was murdered, TED and PAM are his estranged son and daughter
who were cut out of the Estates and Trusts with their lineal descendants and if the murder
allegation is true Eliot could be next.
26. That the Court will take note that a bomb was placed in Eliot’s car (see Graphic images of
car bombing @ www.iviewit.tv) that blew up three cars next to it as well and where every
day of Eliot and Candice’s life that all of these matters are not investigated and handled
properly with fair and impartial due process given them, they are in danger every time they
start their vehicle to take the children to school in the morning.
27. This car bombing alleged to have taken place over Eliot’s claims that reprobate attorneys at
law stole his and others Intellectual Properties worth an estimated billions to trillions
(currently over 90% of internet traffic uses the technologies as they are backbone imaging
and video technologies), and the attorneys at law were using the Court system and other
Government agencies, including the US Patent Office, to enable the highly sophisticated
legal crimes deployed by major law firms to steal the technologies.
28. When caught in the act it is alleged that these lawyers infiltrated some of the highest outposts
of law in efforts to cover up the crimes by interfering with Eliot’s due process rights and by
obstructing Justice inside government agencies and when caught at the cover up then tried to
murder him and have since been pursuing a pattern and practice of crimes to hurt and damage
Eliot and his family.
29. The death of Simon Bernstein if he was murdered may also have been due to his ownership
interests in the Intellectual Properties, his potential settlement interests in Eliot’s RICO and
his intimate knowledge of how the royalties were being converted illegally by the law firms
that stole the technologies (primarily Proskauer Rose LLP) through the Madoff and Sir Allen
Stanford Ponzi Schemes (aka criminal attorney at law and law firm money laundering
schemes for monies stolen from clients.)
30. As the court will note in the Probate and Trust cases involving Eliot’s three minor children
and Oppenheimer, there are accounts at the heart of that matter that came from Stanford
Bank and Stanford Trust that then transferred with the agents from Stanford to Oppenheimer
Trust and the accounts and agents transferred to JP Morgan, where it is alleged that millions
of dollars of Simon’s monies in the estates and trusts disappeared weeks before his untimely
and strange death.
31. Eliot has had repeated death threats over a thirteen year period reported to state and federal
authorities for his Whistleblowing efforts against the highest ranking members of three state
bar associations, judges, prosecutors, attorneys at law and high ranking government officials
throughout the nation who were involved in the thefts of the Intellectual Properties.
Wherefore, Eliot requests that there be an order of federal protection from life
threatening danger to Eliot and his family.
DESIGNATION OF STATUS AS WHISTLEBLOWER AND AFFORD ALL STATE AND
FEDERAL WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTIONS AND PROVIDE FEDERAL WITNESS
PROTECTION
32. That while Eliot is not an attorney at law, nor a member of any bar association, his efforts to
expose the corruption of the members of three state bar associations have led to Orders ( see
URL @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2006%2017%20Cahill%20Motion%20to%20mov
e%20complaints%20krane%20rubenstein.pdf )
from the New York Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Judicial Departmental
Disciplinary Committee for investigation of three of its members, including former deceased
President of the New York State Bar at the time, Steven C. Krane, Esq. of Proskauer Rose
(who died suddenly after the investigations were ordered), Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. of
Proskauer Rose and sole patent evaluator for MPEGLA, LLC (who Eliot claims is the largest
infringer of his Intellectual Properties) and Thomas Cahill, Esq., the former Chief Counsel
for the First Judicial Departmental Disciplinary Committee (who Whistleblower Anderson
sued and immediately after losing her trial against him Judge Scheindlin came into the Court
after the jury had left and entered into the record that she had just learned that Cahill and
others had perjured their testimony in the trial and thus poisoned the jury decision and where
Cahill resigned early amidst the Anderson case and the legally related Iviewit RICO). The
Iviewit RICO4
attorney at law corruption in various divisions of the courts, prosecutors’ offices and more.
is legally related to Anderson and other actions that allege widespread attorney at law corruption in
various divisions of the courts, prosecutors’ offices and more.
That the fraud on the Court in the Anderson case and related cases should lead, when the
time is ripe, for a rehearing for Anderson and the related cases once the court corruption is
cleaned up and it was truly extensive and widespread as Anderson’s testimony revealed.
33. The New York Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Judicial Departmental
Disciplinary Committee was Ordered to be investigated by the New York Appellate Division
of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Departmental Disciplinary Committee. The reason
those ordered investigations were never completed was because new allegations of conflict
were levied against the New York Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial
Departmental Disciplinary Committee.
34. Eliot therefore should be considered a Whistleblower as he is instrumental in bringing about
law enforcement to investigate the corruption in the legal system and because his RICO case
in New York is legally related to New York Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First
Judicial Departmental Disciplinary Committee Attorney at Law Christine C. Anderson, Esq.
whistleblowing lawsuit against State Actors and Disciplinary Departments. So too, the
retaliation against Eliot involved in denying due process to Eliot’s RICO and his bar and
disciplinary complaints is substantially the same as the retaliation suffered by attorney at law
members of the state bar for their Whistleblower efforts.
35. Due to Eliot’s efforts as a Whistleblower he has come under repeated life threatening
retaliations by attorneys at law over the last decade who desire to cover up their crimes
through continued misuse of the courts and justice system to deny him due process, deprive
him of inheritance and to intentionally obstruct his efforts to get fair and impartial treatment
under law and essentially obstructing any/every effort Eliot makes to seek relief, state or federally to protect his rights and protect his family, all in efforts to try and silence Eliot and
his family.
36. That immediately after the recent warnings by Candice Schwager, Esq.5
family and Attorney Barbara Stone, Esq. were in imminent danger of their lives, exhibited
already herein, the bar associations in the respective states recommended disbarment of two
of the attorneys involved with Eliot and helping him, Joanne Denison, Esq. (IL)6
Stone, Esq. (FL)7 in what appears retaliation by the bar associations against them for blowing
the whistle on massive corruption schemes being operated under the color of law by certain
judges and attorneys in their states who they blew the whistle on.
37. These Whistleblowing attorneys are duty bound to report the misconduct of other members
of their profession by their respective state bar Rules of Professional Conduct in the first
place. By following The Rules of Professional Conduct that they take oath under G-d to
uphold, they are compelled to report any misconduct of other attorneys and judges they are
aware of.
38. The good actors are then rewarded with retaliation by the very institution charged with
investigating the corruption of the reprobate attorneys at law and judges they are exposing
and their law licenses are dangled as leverage to silence them and thus their livelihoods that
that Eliot and his family and attorney Barbara Stone.
are held captive by the Bar Associations who can disbar them are used as threats, which is
like being blacklisted from the profession, a typical mob styled racketeering extortion
scheme reminiscent of mob controlled Unions and their extortion of their members.
39. Like the retaliation from Whistleblowing on the corrupt courts by honest attorneys at law
doing what they are duty bound to do, Eliot is also subject to continuous retaliation by these
reprobate attorneys at law because he is pursuing the law firms and thousands of corporations
worldwide that are using Eliot’s technologies through illegal patent pooling schemes the
lawyers are using to benefit themselves not Eliot from the stolen technologies of Eliot’s and
who have illegally blocked Eliot from market through anticompetitive monopolistic patent
pooling schemes and disabling his legal rights to pursue to such illegal combinations like
those conducted by MPEGLA, LLC., which is controlled by Eliot’s former Intellectual
Property Counsel, Proskauer Rose LLP and which licenses thousands of corporations.
40. Many of these companies such as YouTube and Facebook are wholly dependent on Eliot’s
SUSPENDED Intellectual Properties and these companies are directly tied to the alleged
perpetrators of the Intellectual Property crimes in many instances directly to Proskauer Rose,
a large law firm that Eliot is pursuing as the initial conspirator in the thefts and where these
corporations also have incentive to see Eliot and his family and other shareholders and patent
interest holders dead (including his father) versus successful in Court where they could lose
everything if Eliot succeeds and he will in time, when the due process blocks are busted up.
Iviewit / Eliot Bernstein Amended Complaint
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.pdf
March 08, 2008 Shira Scheindlin Dismissal of Iviewit RICO complaint
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080808%20Scheindlin%20Dismissal%20of%20Complaint%20no%20comments.pdf
March 08, 2008 Shira Scheindlin Dismissal of Related Cases to Christine C. Anderson, Esq.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080808%20Scheindlin%20Dismissal%20of%20related%20complaints.pdf
i. Case # 502012CP004391XXXXSB – Simon Bernstein Estate
ii. Case # 502011CP000653XXXXSB – Shirley Bernstein Estate
iii. Case # 502014CP002815XXXXSB – Oppenheimer v. Bernstein Minor Children
iv. Case # 502014CP003698XXXXSB – Shirley Trust Construction
v. Case # 502015CP001162XXXXSB – Eliot Bernstein v. Trustee Simon Trust Case OLD CASE
#502014CA014637XXXXMB
WHISTLEBLOWER, CONTINUATION OF RICO ACTIVITIES AFTER PRIOR
FAMILY MINIVAN CAR BOMBING, PRIOR THREATS, SCHEME TO DENY PROPER
HIS FAMILY VIA NEW THREATS OF PHYSICAL DANGER ACTING AS
MONETIZATION OF INVENTIONS, DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS
AND PROCEDURE THAT IS OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE.
1. That Eliot has previously filed a RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit before Honorable Judge
Shira A. Scheindlin, 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department
Disciplinary Committee, et al. and these matters and the criminal elements both proven and
alleged herein appear to be continuations of those crimes by similar and related parties
mostly reprobate attorneys at law. That Eliot filed an Amended Complaint1
this Court can review those records from that case for more information regarding how the
Iviewit matters tie in to many significant events in US History, including the Bush v Gore
election fraud and Supreme Court nomination in a 5-4 vote for President, the collapse of
Enron and more.
2. That Scheindlin in her err filed dismissal of the RICO2
case as defined at the time.
3. Eliot has recently come under new and continued life threatening danger and severe duress
and seeks this Court’s urgent protection from his Whistleblowing efforts on attorneys at law acting outside the color of law in Florida, in a variety of titles, as judges, prosecutors, private
attorneys, state bar disciplinary agent and more. This danger is evidenced by all the
following ongoing issues in the life of Eliot and his family.
4. Massive recent further fraud and other crimes against Eliot and his family, primarily
committed by attorneys at law, with court escalation of retaliation and denial of due process
and procedure against Eliot that obstructs justice, intentionally and with scienter, to interfere
with expectancies/inheritance for Eliot and his minor children and this retaliation due to his
exposing and having reported to prosecutors and criminal authorities attorneys at law
involved directly in crimes committed in, on and by the Florida Probate court and its Florida
Bar members. Eliot and his family are subjected to domestic terrorism under 18 U.S.C. §
2331 and crimes against Humanity.
5. It appears there is a domestic terrorist organization operating with the legal system, where a
mob styled infiltration has occurred at the highest level in the legal system, using the courts
as their business addresses to facilitate their crimes and operate a human trafficking scheme
through guardianships that rob the victims of their legal rights and theft and money
laundering through the probate courts to steal families properties upon the death of their
loved ones. The courts abuse of process creates a mob styled racketeering enterprise
committed under a tainted color of law in the State of Florida that is given cover by the
Florida Bar, which protects its reprobate members who are part of the scheme and artifice to
defraud citizens.
6. A victim is targeted in the Probate/Guardianship court, their assets then stolen after they are
dead in probate or while still living through guardianships of unlawful chicanery designed to
bleed their victims assets as they are slowly put to their death by illegal court “edicts”,
stripped of legal right through illegal legal custody gained and then defenseless stripped of
their assets and isolated from their family members who get in the way.
7. The officers of the Florida Probate court in Eliot’s parents probate and trusts matters were
caught and have admitted to their law firm committing felony criminal acts, including but not
limited to, proven Post Mortem Fraudulent Alteration and Notarization of Court documents
and Dispositive documents posited with the court as a Fraud on the Court, Post Mortem
Admitted Forgeries of documents for decedents Simon and Shirley and other living parties
including Eliot, numerous past and ongoing Frauds on the court and multiple Frauds
committed against Beneficiaries of the estates and trusts. Further they are undergoing
investigations for other crimes not yet proven but formally alleged, including but not limited
to, Insurance Fraud, Fraud on a Creditor, Fraud on a Federal Court (this Court), Mail and
Wire Fraud, Theft of Estate and Trust Assets, Conversion, Extortion, alleged Murder of
Simon Bernstein by Plaintiff Theodore Bernstein and more.
8. Eliot’s exposure of and objections to the court corruption and his filings with criminal
authorities for acts committed by these attorneys at law, operating as officers and fiduciaries
of the probate courts of Judge Martin Colin, Esq. (“Colin”) and Judge David E. French, Esq.
(“French”) , has been covered up and further aided and abetted by the judges of the Florida
Probate court, which are facilitating these highly sophisticated illegal legal crimes under the
guise of probate proceedings and providing cover for the reprobate attorneys who were
caught.
9. These harms are caused by the very courts that should be upholding Eliot’s rights and
protecting him, especially after he cleaned house for the judges by exposing the bad faith acts
of Florida attorneys at law practicing before their courts, the officers appointed by the courts,
who were found acting in concert to Fraud the court and commit a variety of crimes against
the Beneficiaries, these crimes primarily targeting Eliot.
10. Why Eliot? Eliot was joined together in 2008 with American Hero Whistleblower, New
York Supreme Court Appellate Division Departmental Disciplinary Committee attorney at
law, Christine C. Anderson, Esq., by Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin who legally related
Eliot’s RICO case involving a massive corruption inside government and almost all
attributable to those with legal degrees, to Anderson’s riveting Whistleblower lawsuit that
exposed a criminal cartel operating at the highest levels of the country’s legal system and
protected by the self-regulating failed attorney at law disciplinary departments they
controlled.
11. That Scheindlin related several other Whistleblower citizens fighting the corruption in the
courts for many years together with Anderson and so began a lengthy and ongoing effort to
expose the corruption that plagues our nation by a small group of very dedicated citizens who
fearlessly took on the corruption machine inside the courts, at great personal and familial
costs.
12. That after finding out how the innards of this corruption scheme worked whereby criminals
disguised as attorneys at law are violating law with impunity, it was apparent that they have
seized the keys to the kingdom at the highest outposts of law and turned a country built on
law into lawlessness society.
13. This has created an unprecedented situation in our country, a coup d'état of the legal system
and everything it controls and now requiring unprecedented actions by both citizens and a
brave few lawyers and judges who are willing to stand up in their roles as honorable and duty
bound to justice attorneys at law and bust up this racket that threatens our nation by turning
in those reprobate members who are acting outside the color of law, despite the consequences
against them by those in control of their profession at this time, unafraid of the retaliation
they most certainly will face.
14. Eliot has recently met even more brave Whistleblower attorneys at law, upholding their oaths
to report the misconduct of their brethren, although these are false brethren, as they are really
criminals using law to commit crime and cover them up, using the courts as retaliatory
weapons against the victims and the retaliation of these lawyers who have done nothing
wrong but fulfill their duty to report other members misconduct is swift and vicious.
15. Joining Anderson’s heroic whistleblowing are now Barbara Stone, Esq., Candice Schwager,
Esq., Joanne Denison, Esq., Kenneth Ditkowski, Esq., Kevin R. Hall, Esq. and Dean Loren,
Esq. and other attorney Whistleblowers who are all exposing the illegally formed bar
associations and the crimes in the court they have witnessed firsthand. Now they are in
danger of losing their livelihoods and being viciously retaliated against for their exposure of
the bad actors by what at first glance appears lawyers, judges, prosecutors and the bar
associations and with deeper inspection one finds they are lawbreakers misusing law to target
their victims.
16. There is also another citizen, William Windsor, who has been jailed for his efforts to
expose the public office corruption in the nation by assembling video of nationwide victims
and again Mr. Windsor’s only crime is that of exposing the underbelly of the legal system
through the eyes of victims. http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php
17. The reprobate attorneys are acting to commit crimes in various combinations of racketeering
type fraudulent illegal legal schemes that utilize the courts as host to the crimes and using the
their legal degrees to commit these crimes and then having other criminals disguised as
lawyers planted in the regulatory agencies to cover them up for them, with virtually no fear
of retribution, as the cover up is at the highest levels of the failed self-policing attorney at law
failed Disciplinary Departments, State Bars, Judicial Conduct Commissions and criminal
prosecutorial agencies.
18. The self-policing bar associations and the judicial qualifications commissions instead of
protecting the Whistleblowers exposing their reprobate members and investigating the
complaints filed by the Whistleblowers and citizen victims reporting the misconduct of
judges to them are instead retaliated against.
19. Retaliation against the Whistleblower members of the Florida Bar who are reporting against
other members of the bar committing the crimes include extortionary threats of disbarment
used in efforts to force these brave and heroic whistleblowers from pursuing their acts to
expose the bad actors or else.
20. Further the state bar associations and judicial conduct commissions are denying due process
and procedure of the attorney at law Whistleblowers by disbarring them and preventing and
dismantling their efforts to protect their clients, themselves, their families and the public at
large from the dangers of the reprobate attorneys at law, judges and prosecutors they are
exposing who have corrupted and polluted the legal system, casting a grave appearance of
impropriety over the whole system of jurisprudence and leaving no one capable of putting it
down.
21. The danger to Eliot directly is further evidenced by Eliot and his wife Candice’s receipt of a
phone call at 4am. on April 11, 2015 by his children’s counsel, Candice Schwager, Esq. of
Texas, informing him that their lives were in imminent danger for their whistleblowing
efforts against judicial and attorney at law corruption and to instantly seek federal and state
protections. This phone call and the following actions with state and federal authorities
already involved in Eliot’s life is documented below by attorney at law Barbara Stone, Esq.
who also received a similar call from Candice Schwagger, Esq.:
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 7:07 AM
To: Michael Horowitz [Inspector General @ US DOJ OIG] ~ Partner @ Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft LLP (michael.horowitz@cwt.com ); 'The Honorable Glenn Alan Fine, Inspector General ~
Cc: 'Barbara Stone (bstone575@gmail.com )'; 'JoAnne M. Denison Esq. @ Denison & Associates,
From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein [mailto:iviewit@iviewit.tv ]
Department of Justice'
PC (jdenison@surfree.com )'; Candice Schwager @ Schwager Law Firm
(candiceschwager@icloud.com ); 'Andrew Dietz @ Rock-It Cargo USA, Inc.
(andyd@rockitcargo.com )'; 'CANDICE BERNSTEIN (tourcandy@gmail.com )'; 'Caroline
Prochotska Rogers Esq. (caroline@cprogers.com )'; 'Eliot I. Bernstein (iviewit@iviewit.tv )'; 'Marc
R. Garber Esq. (marcrgarber@gmail.com )'; 'Marc R. Garber Esq. @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.
(marc.garber@flastergreenberg.com) '; 'Michele M. Mulrooney ~ Partner @ Venable LLP
(mmulrooney@Venable.com )'
Subject: Eliot Bernstein. FW: We have been warned by counsel that we are in danger and need
of Federal protection
Dear Inspector General Horowitz, please add this email to my ongoing case file with DOJ OIG. As
this involves further potential dangers to my family, where it has been alleged my father was
murdered and a Coroner’s report reveals several elevated heavy metals, I take this warning very
seriously, especially where I have uncovered and proven fraud and forgeries of deceased parties
to gain Dominion and Control of my deceased father’s estate, the crimes committed by
Attorneys at Law. I have been trying to contact the FBI for several months to report several very
serious crimes that require federal investigations and have supposedly contacted the FBI who
refused to give me names of the people that were supposed to be doing the intake and have not
heard back from them at all. I have tried to contact your offices and similarly I was unable to
confirm anyone’s name that I was speaking to and if in fact you had gotten my messages. Please
feel free to contact me at my numbers below. Eliot
Eliot I. Bernstein
Inventor
From: Eliot Bernstein [mailto:iviewit5@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 6:57 AM
To: 'Detective Andrew Panzer @ Palm Beach County Sheriff (PanzerA@pbso.org)'
Subject: Eliot Bernstein. FW: We have been warned by counsel that we are in danger and need
of Federal protection
Dear Detective Panzer, please add this to the ongoing investigation of my family estate and trust
matters. Barbara Stone is a Florida Attorney who is exposing Judicial Corruption. I got a call at
4am from attorney Candice Schwager who informed me and Candice my wife that our lives and
those of our children were in imminent danger for our Whistleblowing efforts. This warning
came from a licensed attorney. Paul Wright is at the FBI according to Barbara. I was told to
contact state and federal authorities for protection. Eliot
From: barbara stone [mailto:bstone575@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 7:36 PM
To: Paul Wright
Cc: Eliot Bernstein; Candice Schwager, Esq.; JoAnne M Denison, Esq.
Subject: We have been warned by counsel that we are in danger and need of Federal protection
My attorney, Candice Schwager who is also the attorney for Eliot Bernstein contacted
both of us on or about 4:00 am EST on Saturday and advised us to contact Federal
authorities for protection.
She warned me and Eliot Bernstein that we and our families are in danger and in need of
immediate Federal protection due to our efforts to expose judicial corruption.
22. That this wakeup call warning of imminent danger and to get the children protected by a
licensed Attorney at Law has left Eliot and his wife Candice panicked and frantic for the last
two plus weeks trying to get help and keep an eye on the children at the same time and left
them hardly able to keep up with the sudden increased legal hearings and pleadings dumped
on them as the pressure is mounting on the bad actors from the criminal acts being uncovered
in the courts.
23. These sharp practices of heaping hearing after hearing on Eliot seems calculated to heighten
the pressure on them intentionally in the six legal cases involving the Estates and Trusts of
Eliot’s deceased parents, Simon and Shirley as pressure mounts and their crimes are further
uncovered and reported on.
24. Many of the legal actions require strict deadlines, there are a mass of scheduled hearings,
hearings of Eliot’s changed overnight and moved up a month by Judge Colin on his own
initiative with demands that Eliot be present at that time or else lose his rights regarding
complicated accounting proceedings, where thousands of pages of documents were dumped
on him without giving him the opportunity to review them before the hearing and all this
coming as Eliot and others are finding out about a plethora of crimes committed by the
attorneys at law, fiduciaries and other parties involved in the Estates and Trust cases of
Simon and Shirley Bernstein.
25. That the court will again take note that it was alleged by Ted Bernstein and Pamela Simon on
the day Simon died that he was murdered, TED and PAM are his estranged son and daughter
who were cut out of the Estates and Trusts with their lineal descendants and if the murder
allegation is true Eliot could be next.
26. That the Court will take note that a bomb was placed in Eliot’s car (see Graphic images of
car bombing @ www.iviewit.tv) that blew up three cars next to it as well and where every
day of Eliot and Candice’s life that all of these matters are not investigated and handled
properly with fair and impartial due process given them, they are in danger every time they
start their vehicle to take the children to school in the morning.
27. This car bombing alleged to have taken place over Eliot’s claims that reprobate attorneys at
law stole his and others Intellectual Properties worth an estimated billions to trillions
(currently over 90% of internet traffic uses the technologies as they are backbone imaging
and video technologies), and the attorneys at law were using the Court system and other
Government agencies, including the US Patent Office, to enable the highly sophisticated
legal crimes deployed by major law firms to steal the technologies.
28. When caught in the act it is alleged that these lawyers infiltrated some of the highest outposts
of law in efforts to cover up the crimes by interfering with Eliot’s due process rights and by
obstructing Justice inside government agencies and when caught at the cover up then tried to
murder him and have since been pursuing a pattern and practice of crimes to hurt and damage
Eliot and his family.
29. The death of Simon Bernstein if he was murdered may also have been due to his ownership
interests in the Intellectual Properties, his potential settlement interests in Eliot’s RICO and
his intimate knowledge of how the royalties were being converted illegally by the law firms
that stole the technologies (primarily Proskauer Rose LLP) through the Madoff and Sir Allen
Stanford Ponzi Schemes (aka criminal attorney at law and law firm money laundering
schemes for monies stolen from clients.)
30. As the court will note in the Probate and Trust cases involving Eliot’s three minor children
and Oppenheimer, there are accounts at the heart of that matter that came from Stanford
Bank and Stanford Trust that then transferred with the agents from Stanford to Oppenheimer
Trust and the accounts and agents transferred to JP Morgan, where it is alleged that millions
of dollars of Simon’s monies in the estates and trusts disappeared weeks before his untimely
and strange death.
31. Eliot has had repeated death threats over a thirteen year period reported to state and federal
authorities for his Whistleblowing efforts against the highest ranking members of three state
bar associations, judges, prosecutors, attorneys at law and high ranking government officials
throughout the nation who were involved in the thefts of the Intellectual Properties.
Wherefore, Eliot requests that there be an order of federal protection from life
threatening danger to Eliot and his family.
DESIGNATION OF STATUS AS WHISTLEBLOWER AND AFFORD ALL STATE AND
FEDERAL WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTIONS AND PROVIDE FEDERAL WITNESS
PROTECTION
32. That while Eliot is not an attorney at law, nor a member of any bar association, his efforts to
expose the corruption of the members of three state bar associations have led to Orders ( see
URL @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2006%2017%20Cahill%20Motion%20to%20mov
e%20complaints%20krane%20rubenstein.pdf )
from the New York Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Judicial Departmental
Disciplinary Committee for investigation of three of its members, including former deceased
President of the New York State Bar at the time, Steven C. Krane, Esq. of Proskauer Rose
(who died suddenly after the investigations were ordered), Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. of
Proskauer Rose and sole patent evaluator for MPEGLA, LLC (who Eliot claims is the largest
infringer of his Intellectual Properties) and Thomas Cahill, Esq., the former Chief Counsel
for the First Judicial Departmental Disciplinary Committee (who Whistleblower Anderson
sued and immediately after losing her trial against him Judge Scheindlin came into the Court
after the jury had left and entered into the record that she had just learned that Cahill and
others had perjured their testimony in the trial and thus poisoned the jury decision and where
Cahill resigned early amidst the Anderson case and the legally related Iviewit RICO). The
Iviewit RICO4
attorney at law corruption in various divisions of the courts, prosecutors’ offices and more.
is legally related to Anderson and other actions that allege widespread attorney at law corruption in
various divisions of the courts, prosecutors’ offices and more.
That the fraud on the Court in the Anderson case and related cases should lead, when the
time is ripe, for a rehearing for Anderson and the related cases once the court corruption is
cleaned up and it was truly extensive and widespread as Anderson’s testimony revealed.
33. The New York Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Judicial Departmental
Disciplinary Committee was Ordered to be investigated by the New York Appellate Division
of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Departmental Disciplinary Committee. The reason
those ordered investigations were never completed was because new allegations of conflict
were levied against the New York Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial
Departmental Disciplinary Committee.
34. Eliot therefore should be considered a Whistleblower as he is instrumental in bringing about
law enforcement to investigate the corruption in the legal system and because his RICO case
in New York is legally related to New York Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First
Judicial Departmental Disciplinary Committee Attorney at Law Christine C. Anderson, Esq.
whistleblowing lawsuit against State Actors and Disciplinary Departments. So too, the
retaliation against Eliot involved in denying due process to Eliot’s RICO and his bar and
disciplinary complaints is substantially the same as the retaliation suffered by attorney at law
members of the state bar for their Whistleblower efforts.
35. Due to Eliot’s efforts as a Whistleblower he has come under repeated life threatening
retaliations by attorneys at law over the last decade who desire to cover up their crimes
through continued misuse of the courts and justice system to deny him due process, deprive
him of inheritance and to intentionally obstruct his efforts to get fair and impartial treatment
under law and essentially obstructing any/every effort Eliot makes to seek relief, state or federally to protect his rights and protect his family, all in efforts to try and silence Eliot and
his family.
36. That immediately after the recent warnings by Candice Schwager, Esq.5
family and Attorney Barbara Stone, Esq. were in imminent danger of their lives, exhibited
already herein, the bar associations in the respective states recommended disbarment of two
of the attorneys involved with Eliot and helping him, Joanne Denison, Esq. (IL)6
Stone, Esq. (FL)7 in what appears retaliation by the bar associations against them for blowing
the whistle on massive corruption schemes being operated under the color of law by certain
judges and attorneys in their states who they blew the whistle on.
37. These Whistleblowing attorneys are duty bound to report the misconduct of other members
of their profession by their respective state bar Rules of Professional Conduct in the first
place. By following The Rules of Professional Conduct that they take oath under G-d to
uphold, they are compelled to report any misconduct of other attorneys and judges they are
aware of.
38. The good actors are then rewarded with retaliation by the very institution charged with
investigating the corruption of the reprobate attorneys at law and judges they are exposing
and their law licenses are dangled as leverage to silence them and thus their livelihoods that
that Eliot and his family and attorney Barbara Stone.
are held captive by the Bar Associations who can disbar them are used as threats, which is
like being blacklisted from the profession, a typical mob styled racketeering extortion
scheme reminiscent of mob controlled Unions and their extortion of their members.
39. Like the retaliation from Whistleblowing on the corrupt courts by honest attorneys at law
doing what they are duty bound to do, Eliot is also subject to continuous retaliation by these
reprobate attorneys at law because he is pursuing the law firms and thousands of corporations
worldwide that are using Eliot’s technologies through illegal patent pooling schemes the
lawyers are using to benefit themselves not Eliot from the stolen technologies of Eliot’s and
who have illegally blocked Eliot from market through anticompetitive monopolistic patent
pooling schemes and disabling his legal rights to pursue to such illegal combinations like
those conducted by MPEGLA, LLC., which is controlled by Eliot’s former Intellectual
Property Counsel, Proskauer Rose LLP and which licenses thousands of corporations.
40. Many of these companies such as YouTube and Facebook are wholly dependent on Eliot’s
SUSPENDED Intellectual Properties and these companies are directly tied to the alleged
perpetrators of the Intellectual Property crimes in many instances directly to Proskauer Rose,
a large law firm that Eliot is pursuing as the initial conspirator in the thefts and where these
corporations also have incentive to see Eliot and his family and other shareholders and patent
interest holders dead (including his father) versus successful in Court where they could lose
everything if Eliot succeeds and he will in time, when the due process blocks are busted up.
Iviewit / Eliot Bernstein Amended Complaint
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.pdf
March 08, 2008 Shira Scheindlin Dismissal of Iviewit RICO complaint
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080808%20Scheindlin%20Dismissal%20of%20Complaint%20no%20comments.pdf
March 08, 2008 Shira Scheindlin Dismissal of Related Cases to Christine C. Anderson, Esq.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080808%20Scheindlin%20Dismissal%20of%20related%20complaints.pdf
i. Case # 502012CP004391XXXXSB – Simon Bernstein Estate
ii. Case # 502011CP000653XXXXSB – Shirley Bernstein Estate
iii. Case # 502014CP002815XXXXSB – Oppenheimer v. Bernstein Minor Children
iv. Case # 502014CP003698XXXXSB – Shirley Trust Construction
v. Case # 502015CP001162XXXXSB – Eliot Bernstein v. Trustee Simon Trust Case OLD CASE
#502014CA014637XXXXMB
Source, Full Document (MOTION) and to Download
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMjlfV2lDNmNJdHM/edit
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)